“Historical research
is similar to that of an investigation,” I told this research methods class.
“So, today we are going to undertake
[laughter] a murder mystery.” Then, I dramatically removed a cloth that was
draped over the following crime scene…
“The question is, Who
killed the apple [long pause] industry in the Annapolis Valley?” More
laughter followed.
Remember this was a
nutrition class, so I needed to link in nutrition somehow. First though, I
briefly proved that the Valley was once full of orchards by showing then/now
images of places they recognized. Then, I lined up unlikely suspects such as
the witch in Snow White, Isaac Newton, etc. Using primary and secondary sources, we
discussed the history of the apple, its nutritional value or the loss thereof
as a suspect, and the varieties of apples. Eventually, after looking at
historical images of farming equipment, cartoons about Maritime Rights,
diaries, posters, government reports, and newspapers, a possible ‘murderer’
became more apparent. But I left the question of who killed the apple hanging
in the air, careful not to answer it. I hoped that they students would see that
the journey to find the answer was the real reason for the class. After all,
archives are a place of questions—not always a place of answers.
Yes, I stressed over
this one. I used a power point—something I rarely do. I like flip charts and
white boards. I wrote out my presentation as a speech—something I rarely do. I
like to speak naturally and go off topic now and again. But once I started to
think of the class as a “performance” instead of my usual class, I was a bit
more settled with it. I prefer activities that use lesson plans and archival
sources, but this was fun too.
No comments:
Post a Comment