The prof
came to my second session and participated in discussions about the documents.
Personally, I love when that happens. (I may have said this before.) I feel that
it is important for the students to see the prof and the archivist together in
the session and providing two perspectives on the content.
Because the
prof and I had discussed the course content and assignment well in advance, my
research assistant and I were prepared for this class. The assignment involved
the students choosing a research topic, five of which were well represented by
primary documents in the Archives. Oddly enough, that worked out perfectly—the research
room has five tables. As the students entered the room, they randomly chose to
sit at one of the five tables. Each table featured a single, archival document
and a set of questions. All of the students had the same set of questions,
aimed to help them probe the evidence on the table. The groups were given lots
of time to look at the material and share their ideas before they were asked to
speak about the records and discuss the questions with everyone. (Here’s how it
was done: http://archivallessons.blogspot.ca/2013/04/extra-extra-come-learn-all-about-it.html)
As luck
would have it, some students sat at a table with the document that was relevant
to their assignment. My research assistant and I have discussed if we should
label the table’s topics to reduce some of the randomness of selecting a table.
We have decided against it. The luck of the draw (or serendipity) is part of
the experience of visiting an archives. Yes, some students will not be engaged
as a result, but others will enjoy the element of discovery. We did build in a
few minutes near the end of the session for the students to roam around and
look at the documents on the other tables. I hope to incorporate more “roaming”
in my future sessions.
No comments:
Post a Comment